RALEIGH — A new bill filed in the North Carolina Senate could mark a turning point in the long-running fight over the future of the state’s commercial fishing industry.

Senate Bill 1065, introduced April 30, 2026, by coastal lawmakers Sens. Bobby Hanig, Norm Sanderson, and Bob Brinson, would impose a sweeping moratorium on new or expanded state regulations affecting commercial and recreational fishing while lawmakers review a comprehensive fisheries study.

If passed, the moratorium would take effect immediately and remain in place until 2037, unless repealed earlier.

For now, the bill begins its journey through the General Assembly, where it is likely to draw strong support from coastal lawmakers and industry advocates — and scrutiny from environmental groups and others who support tighter fisheries management.

Readers can track the bill’s progress, including committee action and votes, at:
https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2025/S1065

Bill summary

SB 1065 would temporarily prohibit state agencies from adopting new restrictions on fishing practices, including limits on catch, seasons, gear, or reporting requirements.

The bill also blocks any reallocation of harvest quotas between commercial and recreational sectors. It also limits regulatory changes to only those required by federal law or emergency situations.

Lawmakers backing the measure argue that constant rule changes have created instability for coastal businesses and working watermen.

“The seafood industry … [is] essential to the economic stability” of the state, the bill notes (see below for draft of bill), pointing to the need for a more deliberate, study-driven approach to future policy.

Shadow of ‘Shrimpgate’

The bill comes after a series of high-profile disputes over fisheries management, most notably the 2025 “Shrimpgate” controversy.

That debate centered on a proposed ban on shrimp trawling in large areas of North Carolina’s coastal waters. The proposal drew strong opposition from commercial fishermen, who argued it would have devastating economic consequences for coastal communities. Coverage from Albemarle Observer highlighted concerns that the measure could severely impact the state’s shrimping fleet and seafood supply chain.

The proposal ultimately failed, but it underscored ongoing divisions over how fisheries should be managed—and who should have a seat at the table.

Similar debates have continued in recent years, with proposals to restrict certain fishing methods or adjust allocation between user groups. For many in the commercial fishing industry, these efforts have contributed to a sense of regulatory instability.

Balancing stability and sustainability

Supporters of SB 1065 argue the bill offers a needed pause, allowing policymakers to take a more comprehensive, science-based approach before implementing further changes.

At the same time, some conservation and recreational fishing groups have raised concerns in broader fisheries debates that North Carolina’s current management system has not always done enough to protect fish populations.

For example, in recent litigation, the Coastal Conservation Association alleged that some coastal fish stocks have declined significantly and require stronger management measures. These types of concerns suggest that some stakeholders may worry a broad regulatory pause could limit the state’s ability to respond quickly to changing environmental conditions or stock assessments.

The bill does include exceptions allowing regulatory action when required by federal law or in response to emergencies, such as fishery collapse or public safety threats..

New Commission

In addition to the regulatory moratorium, the bill would reestablish the Joint Legislative Commission on Seafood and Aquaculture, a 15-member body tasked with studying and supporting the industry.

The commission would include:

• Four state senators
• Four state representatives
• Four members appointed by the governor
• Three members appointed by the commissioner of agriculture

Its responsibilities would include evaluating regulations, exploring ways to expand seafood production and aquaculture, and recommending legislative changes.

While membership is controlled by political appointments, the structure leaves room for individuals with industry experience to be selected, particularly through gubernatorial and agriculture commissioner appointments.

Draft of SB 1065