ELIZABETH CITY — Elizabeth City residents could face rising utility bills and additional infrastructure costs as city council prepares to consider a large-scale residential development that would bring hundreds of new homes to the western edge of the city.

While the proposal promises new housing and population growth, some city officials warn that the rapid pace of development could place significant strain on Elizabeth City’s electric grid, water system, sewer infrastructure and public safety services, potentially forcing residents to pay more each month in utility costs and taxes.

Give this story a solid read – yeah, on first glance it’s a boring infrastructure story, but if you read into it and see what I see, EC residents may get screwed into paying higher utility rates while they foot the bill for more and more infrastructure. Am I missing something here? Why do people keep electing the morons to council who are inclined to make decisions that have the potential to cost the residents more and more money?    

The council will hold public hearings Monday night, March 9, on requests to annex and rezone land for the proposed 565-unit Tanglewood Crossing subdivision, a development planned on a 157-acre tract off Halstead Boulevard Extended.

The hearings will take place during the council’s regular meeting, which begins at 7 p.m. upstairs at the municipal building on Colonial Avenue.

Monday’s hearing will give residents an opportunity to voice their opinions before the council makes a final decision on the requests.

For supporters, the project represents new housing opportunities and economic growth.

For critics, the issue is whether Elizabeth City can afford the infrastructure expansion required to support developments of this scale without passing the costs on to existing residents.

As the city weighs the future of Tanglewood Crossing, the debate highlights a larger question facing Elizabeth City: how to manage growth responsibly while protecting taxpayers and utility customers from the escalating costs that often follow rapid development.

Flashback — City council voted 4-2 on Feb. 23 to schedule the public hearings on the annexation and rezoning requests.

First Ward Councilmen Joe Peel and Johnson Biggs voted against holding the hearings.

Praise God that Peel used that meeting to present his analysis of the financial impact of rapid growth, urging fellow council members to carefully consider how development decisions made today could affect city residents for years to come.

Utility costs could rise with growth

One of the central concerns raised by council members is the growing cost of maintaining and expanding the city’s electric system as new subdivisions continue to be approved.

According to projections presented by Councilman Peel, the wave of housing construction already approved — combined with projects like Tanglewood Crossing — could increase the average city resident’s utility costs by about $44 per month, or roughly $528 per year.

Peel told fellow council members that 2,283 housing units have already been approved across Elizabeth City. If built, those developments could bring approximately 5,700 additional residents to the city.

That would represent an estimated 33 percent increase in population, dramatically increasing demand for electricity, water and sewer services.

Meeting that demand, Peel warned, will require expensive infrastructure upgrades that will ultimately be paid for by ratepayers.

Electric system facing major expansion

The city’s electric department is already preparing for the strain of increased demand.

In January, the council approved a $2.65 million bid for the construction of a new electric substation to serve growing development in the western part of the city.

However, officials estimate the total project could eventually cost as much as $12 million once construction and equipment expenses are fully accounted for. WTF!? How’s that happen?

The city plans to finance the project through a bond, meaning electric customers would be responsible for repaying the debt over time.

Peel estimated that if the city borrows $12 million at 5 percent interest, the electric system would face annual payments of about $780,000.

At the same time, the city’s wholesale power supplier, ElectriCities, is expected to increase costs by 4.5 percent, adding further pressure to local rates.

Combined, those factors could push the average monthly electric bill from about $143 to roughly $155, Peel said.

Developer exploring outside power option

Adding another layer of complexity to the issue is the possibility that the new subdivision may not rely entirely on the city’s electric system.

During discussions with the planning board in December, Tim Culpepper of Canopy Development said the company intends to explore an agreement with Albemarle Electric Membership Corporation in Hertford to help supply electricity to the project.

The idea would be to reduce demand on Elizabeth City’s electric system by allowing an outside provider to serve part of the development.

Peel expressed concern about that possibility, arguing it could leave city residents responsible for paying the cost of new electrical infrastructure while the development generating the demand purchases power elsewhere.

In that scenario, the city could be left paying for upgrades without gaining the additional customer revenue needed to offset the investment.

Water and sewer systems also under pressure

Electric infrastructure is only part of the financial challenge.

Peel’s analysis also projected major costs for expanding the city’s water and sewer systems if development continues at its current pace.

To meet increased demand for drinking water, the city’s well field could require as many as eight additional wells, each costing around $1 million to build.

For the city’s 7,126 water customers, that expansion could translate into an additional $7 per month on water bills.

Sewer upgrades could also be necessary to handle higher wastewater flow, potentially increasing sewer bills by about $12 per month.

Taken together, the electric, water and sewer increases could represent a significant new financial burden for residents already dealing with rising living costs.

Public safety expansion may follow

Growth on the scale proposed for Elizabeth City would also require additional investment in public safety infrastructure.

Peel warned that the city could eventually need to build a new fire station and purchase additional equipment to maintain emergency response times.

A new fire station and truck alone could cost around $10 million, according to preliminary estimates.

Those figures do not include the cost of hiring additional police officers, firefighters and building inspectors, positions that would likely be required as the population grows.

Possible property tax increases

The costs associated with those services would come from the city’s General Fund, which is primarily supported by property taxes.

Peel estimated that accommodating growth could require at least a 3.5-cent increase in the property tax rate.

For a homeowner currently paying around $1,500 annually in city property taxes, that increase would amount to roughly $93 more per year.

Development proposal before council

Against that backdrop, the council will consider annexation and rezoning requests for the Tanglewood Crossing subdivision.

The project would place 565 residential units on a 157-acre tract located behind Hall Honda and along the western edge of the Stockbridge neighborhood.

The property is owned by Virginia Beach resident Mehul Shah, while the rezoning application was submitted by Canopy Development, a company based in Norfolk.

The land is currently zoned for Commercial (C-1) and Industrial (I-2) uses.

If the rezoning request is approved, those classifications would be changed to residential zoning that would allow the subdivision to be built.

Under the proposal:

  • The Commercial portion would be rezoned R-6, allowing multi-family housing such as townhomes and duplexes.
  • The Industrial portion would become R-8, which is intended primarily for single-family homes on roughly 8,000-square-foot lots.

The majority of the subdivision would consist of single-family homes, with higher-density housing placed in designated sections.

Annexation would place property inside city

The annexation request is tied directly to the rezoning proposal because about half of the property currently lies outside Elizabeth City’s municipal limits.

Electric Department Deputy Director Donnell White explained earlier this year that the tract currently has a mixed service situation.

Part of the land is expected to receive utilities from Elizabeth City, while the remainder sits in an area where property owners could choose a different provider.

If annexed, the entire development would fall under the city’s jurisdiction, meaning Elizabeth City would be responsible for delivering municipal services to the property.

Stay connected to what matters.

Get northeastern North Carolina’s most important stories delivered in your inbox every Friday.

One email per week. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy for more information.


Discover more from Albemarle Observer

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 responses to “Rising Utility and Infrastructure Costs: Elizabeth City’s Development Dilemma”

  1. Frederick Wright Avatar
    Frederick Wright

    Why is the developer not paying for the needed infrastructure upgrades?

  2. Scott Perry Avatar
    Scott Perry

    Elizabeth City and Pasquotank County stand at a crossroads, where measured growth can revitalize the region without sacrificing its character as the cultural and economic hub of Northeastern North Carolina. The key is to grow the city up and out, starting with revitalizing downtown’s empty spaces to attract a new population of taxpayers and businesses. However, infrastructure must come first to ensure sustainability. Empty rooms and buildings in the historic downtown district offer prime opportunities for redevelopment into mixed-use spaces—retail on the ground floor, offices and apartments above—drawing in young professionals, families, and entrepreneurs. (To some extent, Elizabeth City is moving in this direction, but the approach needs to be on a larger scale.) The strategy mirrors successful revitalizations in small cities like Lowell, Massachusetts, where abandoned mills were transformed into housing, offices, shops, and museums, breathing new life into the economy and creating thousands of jobs while preserving historic charm. By focusing on adaptive reuse, Elizabeth City can foster a vibrant, walkable core that boosts tourism tied to its waterfront, landmark district, and Coast Guard presence, ultimately increasing the tax base to fund further improvements.
    A bold step toward funding this growth is to divest from city-owned utilities to unlock capital for strategic investments. Selling the electric company will generate substantial revenue—estimates suggest a sale price in the range of $50-100 million based on comparable municipal utilities, minus contract breakage costs, potentially around $10-20 million. After paying off city debt, the remaining funds are to be used to establish a community bank dedicated to lending to businesses that commit to creating at least 12 jobs in Elizabeth City. This model draws from South Dakota’s thriving community banking sector, where institutions like Dacotah Bank and CorTrust Bank have sustained local economies for decades by providing tailored loans to small businesses and agriculture, fostering job growth and financial stability in rural areas. In South Dakota, these banks have outpaced national averages in asset growth and community reinvestment, demonstrating that locally controlled capital can drive prosperity without reliance on large external lenders. In Elizabeth City, such a bank would prioritize startups and expansions in underutilized commercial spaces, helping address the region’s high poverty rate and low-wage service jobs by incentivizing higher-paying opportunities in manufacturing, tech, and services, and similarly, selling water and sewer utilities—potentially yielding another $30-50 million—to finance land improvements along the waterfront and downtown. The idea echoes Vero Beach, Florida, which sold its electric utility to Florida Power & Light in 2018, resulting in a 21% rate drop for customers and over $100 million in long-term savings, which were reinvested in infrastructure upgrades and community projects.
    Prioritizing Pasquotank County for initial development makes strategic sense given its central location and its commutability from neighboring counties such as Northern Currituck, Camden, Perquimans, Chowan, and Gates. This connectivity positions Elizabeth City as a regional hub, where workers can access jobs without long commutes, reducing traffic congestion on highways leading to the Outer Banks or the Virginia border. Once Pasquotank’s commerce parks are built out, expansion can radiate to surrounding areas, creating a networked economic/opportunity zone. To counter excuses about a lack of skilled labor, the focus should be on attracting the existing workforce through targeted recruitment and training. North Carolina’s community colleges, including the College of The Albemarle, are statutorily required to provide workforce training when businesses relocate or expand in the state, offering customized programs at low or no cost. Proven effectiveness in rural settings, such as Wisconsin’s community colleges, where partnerships with local industries have created pathways into manufacturing and healthcare, boosting participants’ employment rates by 20-30% and helping small towns in Ohio retain young talent through aligned credential programs.
    Building Elizabeth City up and out requires targeted land remediation, particularly at the former shipyard site, to prepare for new developments such as condominiums along Riverside Street. These projects would generate maintenance, management, and service jobs that are sustainable and walkable, echoing the city’s historical waterfront industries from Charles Creek Bridge to the Camden Causeway, where workers once walked to living-wage jobs in local businesses, supporting families and spawning spin-offs along Weeksville Road and Ehringhaus Street. While the urban park development is a nice amenity, it creates few sustainable jobs compared with intergenerational employers such as Pell Paper Box Company, IXL Cabinets, and the enduring Perry Auto Group, which have anchored the economy and created immeasurable ripple effects through supplier networks. Revitalizing the waterfront in this way draws on successes such as Chattanooga, Tennessee, where riverfront redevelopment transformed a declining industrial area into a hub of parks, housing, and businesses, catalyzing over $4 billion in economic activity and thousands of jobs while improving flood resilience.
    Elizabeth City’s underutilized assets, such as ports, railheads, and airports, must be leveraged to drive growth. During the last major storm, Food Lion demonstrated the port’s viability by using barges to supply stores. At the same time, the railhead continues to move products to the Port of Norfolk, and facilities such as Hoffer Flows remain operational. Past missed opportunities—such as UPS’s proposed 40-job facility or a Canadian glass company’s interest in the Pasquotank commerce park, both thwarted by shortsighted leadership—highlight the need to reject a status quo of subjugated welfare dependency or low-opportunity government jobs in drug-plagued Section 8 housing. Instead, embrace proactive development to create a thriving community.
    Addressing water infrastructure is critical, given reports of cancer-causing agents in the system and the need for replacement. Rather than discarding old pipes, repurpose them by running fiber-optic cabling throughout the city to ensure universal connectivity. Internet access is the modern prosperity highway; without it, residents are left behind in the new economy, unable to secure living-wage opportunities. This innovative approach has worked in places like Madison County, Kentucky, where deploying fiber through existing water pipes cut installation costs by 50%, accelerating broadband rollout in rural areas and boosting economic participation. The UK’s government-backed trials have similarly shown that threading fiber through water mains reduces disruption and speeds up connections to hard-to-reach homes.
    This model for measured growth isn’t limited to Elizabeth City—it can be replicated along North Carolina’s east coast, creating a new golden age by drawing on lessons from the past. By leveraging local historical industries and integrating modern infrastructure, such as broadband and revitalized waterfronts, communities can foster self-sufficiency and prosperity. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, exemplifies this: Investments in its riverfronts spurred $2.6 billion in development with just $130 million in public funds, yielding a 20:1 return through mixed-use projects that blended history, recreation, and the economy. Adopting these proven strategies will position Elizabeth City and Pasquotank County as leaders in sustainable, inclusive growth.

    1. Sean Dos Santos Avatar

      Why did you have to make a compelling argument? You used forethought and common sense, which is something neither that City Council and Mayor of Elizabeth City do, nor the Pasquotank Board of Commissioners. You can’t use polysyllabic words to talk to these chowderheads. They see $ signs and lose their collective minds. Infrastructure be damned.

Let us know what you think by leaving a comment. Comments are subject to approval.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search the Albemarle Observer


Upcoming Events

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Keep Local News Alive – The Albemarle Observer covers news deserts and more in northeastern NC. For less than a cup of coffee per month, you can help us keep going.

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

$15.00
$25.00
$50.00
$15.00
$25.00
$50.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

Designed with WordPress

Discover more from Albemarle Observer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading